<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;I like women, I really do.  I just don&#8217;t understand them&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ladygeek.com/archives/104/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ladygeek.com/archives/104#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=i-like-women-i-really-do-i-just-dont-understand-them</link>
	<description>Helping businesses sell technology to women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Whitcombe</title>
		<link>http://ladygeek.com/archives/104/comment-page-1#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Whitcombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ladygeek.org.uk/archives/104#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Ah well, all this is true, of course, and who could possibly know better than Sean, who so famously fell foul of the media (not to mention the vast majority of TV viewers) when he admitted that his own interaction with the fairer sex involved the occasional &quot;slap&quot; now and then. Only when strictly necesary, obviously. And for her own good, mind you...

That, of course, was back in the 80s, and one would hope that intergender communication might have come along a little since then. Or, in the words of Miss Moneypenny, that James might have &quot;come good on all his double entendres&quot;, at the very least.

But, certainly, as multimedia platforms pervade more and more aspects of life, both in professional forum as well as homelife, the absence of selectively specific, and uncondescending tech marketing, equates to an extraordinary failure to tap into a huge potential market audience.

Technology has a licence to thrill, but presently it is guilty of a crital failure to fulfill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah well, all this is true, of course, and who could possibly know better than Sean, who so famously fell foul of the media (not to mention the vast majority of TV viewers) when he admitted that his own interaction with the fairer sex involved the occasional &#8220;slap&#8221; now and then. Only when strictly necesary, obviously. And for her own good, mind you&#8230;</p>
<p>That, of course, was back in the 80s, and one would hope that intergender communication might have come along a little since then. Or, in the words of Miss Moneypenny, that James might have &#8220;come good on all his double entendres&#8221;, at the very least.</p>
<p>But, certainly, as multimedia platforms pervade more and more aspects of life, both in professional forum as well as homelife, the absence of selectively specific, and uncondescending tech marketing, equates to an extraordinary failure to tap into a huge potential market audience.</p>
<p>Technology has a licence to thrill, but presently it is guilty of a crital failure to fulfill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

